Do stun guns work?
Based on manufacturers' and dealers' claims, one would think that stun
guns are remarkably powerful defensive tools. Unfortunately, it appears that reality falls
short of the claims.
Several of AWARE's instructors have taken a course which, in part, trains
its students to be able to quickly and accurately use a handgun while under
stress, in pain, or even if wounded. One of the exercises ran as follows:
One by one, each student faced a target at a distance of about five yards,
with his or her handgun fully loaded and holstered. Standing behind the
student was an instructor with a stun gun. The instructor applied the stun
gun to the student's arm, leg, or back (students with cardiac problems
were barred from participating in this exercise). The shock of the stun gun
was the signal for the student to draw her handgun and to empty it as
quickly and as accurately as possible. The instructor ceased applying the
stun gun when the student began to draw.
The reactions of the students varied a bit. Some grunted or shouted when
"hit" with the stun gun. Some lowered their stance into a crouch or went
to one knee. Others showed no reactions except for drawing their guns. All
were able to quickly draw their guns and deliver a cylinder- or
magazine-full of center-zone shots. Hundreds of students have
successfully completed this exercise.
So much for a "mere touch" completely immobilizing an attacker or a
"half-second burst" scrambling his mind.
Yes, the shock of the stun gun did hurt, but it was not incapacitating.
Indeed, the stun gun manufacturers say that it is not the pain, but rather
the neurological or muscle-fatiguing effects that defeat an attacker.
However, what is going to be an attacker's reaction to pain? He's going to
want to stop the source or get away from it. It's probable that applying a
stun gun for five or ten seconds, or longer, could disable an attacker. Do
you think you would be able to hold a stun gun against a stronger,
struggling attacker for that long? If so, do you even need the stun gun?
Remember that stun guns are contact weapons; they have to actually touch the
attacker. You are precluded from taking advantage of certain tactical
options, such as employing cover. The Taser partially offsets this
disadvantage, and also provides some opportunity for longer application of
the electric shock. Nonetheless, even these devices have questionable
effectiveness. A prime example was the Rodney King incident. Also, Tasers
offer only one or two "shots" of probes before needing to be reloaded.
While stun guns might be helpful in some situations, such as police
officers dealing with passively resistant subjects, they have serious
shortcomings for self-defense use.
Based on our experiences, we are unwilling to entrust our lives to stun
guns.